Support my work on Patreon: http://ow.ly/3ymWFu
PayPal Donations Welcome. Click here: http://goo.gl/NSdOvK
5G Technology: Potential Risks To Human Health: Excerpts From Scientific Conference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvPg1AyQ43I
IARC article: http://ow.ly/x3aL1017tA9
World's Largest Animal Study on Cell Tower Radiation Confirms Cancer Link: http://ow.ly/ive31017tAa
cancer.gov article: http://ow.ly/ETQx1017tAc
Creative commons, royalty free images & Videos used in this video presentation are sourced from https://pixabay.com/ and Wiki Media Commons. These are public commons images.
Help Support My Channel. Buy Computing Forever Merchandise, Mugs, Hats, T-Shirts: http://ow.ly/3v3TWq
Subscribe to my Second Channel: http://ow.ly/XgZm100E1L6
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/user/LACK78
KEEP UP ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/ComputingForever
Google+ : LACK78: http://goo.gl/k4gWsg
Google+: Computing Forever: http://goo.gl/Q8gZpY
while seeing this is thought of the effect 4G might already have on animals, i searched "4G effect on bees" and a ton of articles about that showed up. tech giants and their lobbying have become a cancer on the world.
Cancers take 10 years to develop, if you get exposed to a carcinogen you will find out how harmful it is 10 years after exposure, sometimes you need repeated exposure for decades to get it. Even if that energy causes you cancer finding a correlation will be very tricky since you are also exposed to things like Pizza and Splenda.
It's all about the mechanism. There is no mechanism for this type of radiation to do anything other then increase heat.
Rat-based studies are cheap and unreliable, so there's going to be a lot of them with less then accurate results.
Some say that trees suppress 5G transmissions. Problem? Nah, not really - just cut down the trees! https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/22/sheffield-tree-protester-arrested-for-playing-plastic-trumpet
Longitude is properly pronounced as *lon-g-too-d* not "long-g-too-d" ... when's the last time you heard a sane person pronounce it your way when speaking of longitude and latitude coordinates of a map? ...
You're not asking the right "expert" when it comes to the dangers of 5G. You need to talk with Dr. Jack Kruse. He KNOWS and KNOWS he KNOWS. LOL! He's got all the answers about 5G. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-kt3_oQ8ns
It's all about frequency, same goes for the frequency range of light and even sound. And, detrimental cognitive effects (like sleep- and attention disturbances), malformed blood and damage to ovaries seem more likely primary dangers rather than cancer imo. While not lethal, quality of life while living is quite a bit more important to me. I find the cautionary principle reasonable, when in doubt. Of course, everything points to there being a very extremist elite today which seems insatiable in their want for control and power (common trait among deeply disturbed people), and needless to say a network of tightly distributed receivers will make it possible to pinpoint just about anyone with a very high resolution. If more of these transmitters also have frequency-hopping abilities, they can definitely be used to affect processes in objects nearby - like people. I don't think tinfoil will be enough ;-) XD
Any frequencies close to matching the lengths of individual molecular material that makes up a structure are going to reflect off of those structures. That would cause those structures to (at least partially) absorb energy from, and be at least slightly damaged by, those frequencies. The damage which would occur would depend on 1. the intensity of the frequency, 2. how close of a match the frequency is to the length of the molecules in the structure, 3. the strength of the structure's material, and 4. the amount of time the material is exposed for.
If 5G is non-ionizing and doesn't produce heat, then I'd imagine it would, at the very least, cause a tingling sensation which could (plausibly) turn painful over time as the vibration of our skin cells gets increasingly amplified over time from the exposure to a frequency that closely matches the length of our skin cells (causing our skin cells to vibrate, which might be painful if not out right shaking our skin cells to death), just like how an opera singer can break a glass with the right tone in her voice by causing it to vibrate more and more. Watch the Mythbuster's episode on it if you don't know what I'm talking about or don't believe me. Hopefully I'm not entirely correct on that though.
it is beyond dangerous
and i am already sicker in a 5g area
ive never had issues in my life till i moved to an area where smart meters are all over
and 5g towers are by where i work
i now find my body dying, skin thin, all sorts of issues i have never experienced before..
and over all malaise
Im personally hyped for 5g. I love new tech.
Honestly... we just need to get a damn cure for cancer already. Everything seems to be linked to cancer nowadays, so prevention seems near impossible with or without cell towers causing it. I totally understand the concern though.
The World Health Organisation needs to be treated with caution, it is an international lobby group taking its lead from pharma Companies and professional scare mongers. They ban the press from meeting, have secret votes and minders sent round to reeducate descenting voices at their conferences. Their list of cancer causing risks now includes toasted bread, making their warnings meaningless once you see the full context they created.
They say "environmental levels of of cell tower radiation".... which unfortunately for them is not well defined enough. They could be taking the power right at the cell tower and calling that "environmental", but unless you sleep next to a repeater, you're not getting that radiation, and radiation intensity falls of by 1/r^2.... so what were their "levels" of radiation they exposed things to? Also the study that found cancer in animals linked to cell tower exposure doesn't say in the description what kind of animal? Were they birds? or were they rodents? It makes a HUGE difference.
Here's a video that states that 5G Wi-Fi radiation does the most damage to a female's ovaries, since there is no radiation protection for her eggs. It alters the mitochlorian D.N.A., that is ONLY noticeable, in a person's grandchildren. This generation will see NO health risks, but the generation 40 years from now, will feel the effects of what we've lived through.
5:40 Before you unmount your *smoke detectors*: *You* probably don't have a radioactive one!
These are only used where regular smoke detectors (which you use in living spaces) would produce false alarms too often: Machine halls (e.g. metal dust), storages in farms (e.g. flower dust), etc.
Greed , the nature of greed assists us in believing what we want, rather then what's true,I'm certain there is danger to it, I'm still one who uses the microwave regularly. The sun and solar radiation have been cancer causing since the Flood, When God took away our outer icy shell ?! ...?
Better safe than sorry. Clearly we should be getting conclusive evidence one way or the other before rolling these things out en masse, simply because it's much harder to get rid of them than it is to implement them. People become dependant on them, but I guess that's what they count on.
Call me paranoid, but I don't keep my phone in my pocket when I'm at home or work, I keep it on a desk a few feet away. I figure it's the TOWERS that produce the most energy, but I just don't like the idea of any sort of high-energy device near my balls...
fuck the possible cancer if it get absorbed it heats us! on one side they tell it doesnt give us canser on the other hand they proven that wlan affects plants or cellphones heat us and they already use microwaves for riotcontrol
Forget that rat studies afair they debunked this. There was a study on rats that were already in the middle of their life expectancy and not to mention it was a species of rats that had a high probability of getting cancer.
Skin absorbing low energy, non-ionizing radiation like this will just warm it up, might even burn some subcutaneous fat, it won't cause cancer, only ionizing radiation does that, it's no worse than being exposed to a microwave, and since your phone is 1/100th the power of a microwave and you are 10x bigger than anything you could put in the microwave, you'll be fine.
its all about control, those that reign over us are getting paranoid that their evil little ways, ridiculous greed and corruption are becoming known, there are enough of us to cause them problems at the moment, i wonder if other countries/races will have 5g towers using the same frequencies ? its become pretty obvious that a certain group of people are trying their best to destroy whites at the moment and particularly white European Christians . [ please do your own research , dont be a feeble minded brainwashed left wing twat, governments and those behind the governments cannot be trusted, a certain german leader knew what was happening yrs ago but no one listened, we have bought this on ourselves ]
the 2.4g signal messes with the water in your body. 5g will mess with the oxygen levels in your body. Its funny they mapped/linked up these frequencies to the same exact ones your body uses for water and air. couldn't pick any others for internet use could they?Coincidence? Don't be fuckin fooled. This is a joke!! Visit thefullertoninformer.com
other effects beyond the thermal effects of wifi and telephone radiation are not being considered. Voltage gated calcium channels in cell membranes are activated, causing catastrophic malfunction. This is a non thermal effect with serious health consquences. Google it.
My respect for Computing Forever just increased by a huge magnitude. Almost nobody dares touch upon the subject of the holy wireless communication devices that are propping up everywhere - smart meters being one of the new technologies emitting high levels or "none ionizing" radiation.
The risk is minimal. Most of the 'Dangers of cell-phones' is scare-mongering. 5:05 - You nail it right there. This is totally correct. I work in the RF field, so am well versed in the potential dangers of high RF exposure. The typical cell-phone output, as pointed out at that time index, is between 500mW and 3,000mW(3-watts) or so. This is not of a sufficient output power to 'Cook your brains' or any other kind of scare monger's claim. The output power of the average cell-phone tower is around 15-watts. Standing right beside the antenna of a cell-phone tower with that output will cause you no harm at all. Microwave energy is NOT radioactive energy - something that people often confuse. The danger comes from a combination of BOTH the output power in watts, and the frequency. Having said that, you would not want to be the conductor between RF out and ground at any power above 30W or so. If you were to touch the RF output of a transmitter running 50W or so, and ground at the same time, you will know about it, and it could leave you with RF burns that can take a good six months to grow out. But this assumes you are touching the RF out and ground at the same time(so YOU become the antenna) - not very likely for 99% of the population. Possible for a technician who was not being careful when working on a radio tower. As for the general population - zero risk.
Have you seen how much radiation is emitted from smoking tobacco? Fertilizers containing radium dramatically increase the yield of plantation and it's decay elements: radon, lead-210 and polonium-210 stick to the leaves. When burned, these decay elements release alpha and gamma radiation. The average smoker is exposed to far more ionizing radiation than an astronaut who spends 6 months in the ISS...
When I was young, there was this power thing in my front yard and the local kids used to gather and sit on it. I'm not sure what it's called. Some kind of energy transformer?
I get sick imagining the amount of radiation I probably got form it
How do you know if 5G is safe or not? You gingers have no souls!!! j/k I agree, we do need more studies. Only trust sources with ZERO ties or funding from the 5G industry because those studies will ALWAYS say there's nothing to worry about! Just like the oil industry funded "Leaded Gasoline" studies that claimed the lead in gas was harmless.
You cannot trust any government agencies to tell the truth. You cannot trust any studies funded by industry to tell the truth. The only studies you can trust are those that do not stand to gain anything. Governments gain control and surveillance - industry gains monopoly powers and collude with governments (for control and surveillance). On top of that, we don't get a do-over here. We should not proceed without knowing the exact effects of 5G radiation.
The trouble with studying any ubiquitous tech is that there aren't good control groups. But this is the eternal gamble of ubiquitous tech: if it's universally useful, and no one finds a noticeable risk after using the tech, then all control groups disappear voluntarily by switching to the tech.
Terrestial radio transmission has been around for a long time, and at vastly larger power levels, although lower frequencies. Analog radio and TV required lots of power for reasonable S/N ratios at the recieving end. That said, I don't like the development of continent covering 4 and 5G electro smog.
In the $25 million National Toxicology Program study, the rodents under study were exposed to radiofrequency radiation for 9 hours a day for 2 YEARS and even in utero. The experimental rodents also lived longer than the control mice, and there was no dose-response effect, ie more radiation did not correlate with more cancer. So don't extrapolate very far from this study.
In addition, they conducted dozens of different analyses, so the chances are very good that in such a situation, you end up with some seemingly significant results due to random chance.
Speculating without evidence is not a scientific method but since we have no solid evidence, we can only do that. So my opinion is that they are providing us with 5G Tech (possibly) for quite a few reasons
1) To make us spend more and more money on the devices they sell to us
2) To be able to locate us through the radiation absorbed by our skin even without us having devices
3) To make us sick either to make pharmaceutical companies rich, or for depopulation purposes
If there is no health risk, reasearchers will never be fully sure. You can only be fully sure if there is a measurable effect.
The fact that so much research has been done for so many years and it is still inconclusive means it is safe to assume there is no ill-effect to be found.
No is the very plain very simple answer and if you're having to use papers from the 70s to try to back up your own irrational fear then you are grasping at straws.
You want to go back look again, firstly ignore anything that's in a bull shit journal, like Hindawi, Jama and or MSM (Medical Science Monitor).
Secondly you only want to be looking at paper beyond 2000, and finally the only reason this BS started in the 1st place i because WHO changed their statement, "Does not cause cancer."
To that cell phones may be “possibly carcinogenic to humans." The change from “no conclusive evidence” to “possibly carcinogenic” was not new research, the footnote accompanying the IARC press release clearly states — that a “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (2B) classification by IARC is based on “limited evidence of carcinogenicity” and that “chance, bias, or confounding could not be ruled out with reasonable confidence.”
I.e. were just not 100 %, we're about 95 but not 100.
Why don't you have a look at any chemical MSDS and jump straight to the carcinogenic section, it will virtually always say: Possibly, maybe.
And the majority of these chemicals that I'm thinking of right now such as DCM, TBDPS-Cl and Imidazole have a hell of a bigger chance of causing cancer than microwaves.
Measurments, tests on small animals and studies based on finding correlations are okay, but what I think researchers should do is to find what mechanism in particular is harming us. Now if they come up with lots of theories, test them and dont find any such mechanism, then we are pretty safe I guess. However, if they do find and prove there is a particular way non ionizing radiation is harming us, then we can say for sure it is harmful and we would know exactly why and how.
Because of all this confusion, they will move ahead with this, and only if a lot of people are OBVIOUSLY fucked by it will they change it, but not without a good fight like the tobacco industry did. Too much money involved for them to just acknowledge it and change. They will have to be forced to it, if at all... but with all these "inconclusive" shit, who will?? Or like with the tobacco industry, we'll need some internal memos or emails or something of equal value to "expose" them...
So in the end... we still don't know, which is what we already knew!!
So for every one favorable article there are many that are against it... wow, but we already knew that, we were hoping that Computing Forever, a sort of an expert, would at least tell us where MOST of the good science is on this.
What a video!!
The PC community has grown a good deal in a really limited time frame and there isnt any reason to believe the game wont be equally as addicting for Xbox players. The site states its something PUBG Corp wants to add down the road, perhaps as soon as the game is finished, as shown by a Microsoft representative. More info about the 3 PUBG cosmetic packs are found over on Xbox Wire. The lot of different cheats weve encountered has far surpassed our expectations. Start out with our substantial range of PUBG ideas, which provides you with a whopping number of approaches to assist in improving your game. Just ensure you choose only the appropriate account for you! At times you will discover that you require a different video card to totally experience what the game offers.
The Honest to Goodness Truth on Pubg Warrior Pack
Nevertheless, its always tough to locate a trustworthy seller of a Black Desert account on account of the risk involved in these sorts of transactions. Bring on such a desert map! We guess because its about becoming the lone survivor, even if theres a lot of teamwork on the way.
The game will probably remain in early access for some moment. It continues to attract new players that are hoping to get that sweet, sweet chicken dinner. This usually means youre have to begin downloading the game at midnight, and after that begin playing once PUBG is installed. There isnt just one play through of Black Desert that ends up the same because its up to the player to determine the method by which they level. Because of this, players will need to use the Xbox Game Preview program to be able to play the game. Xbox One players might have to wait somewhat longer for the full-release edition. They will also be able to purchase some exclusive content in the form of special cosmetic packs.
Things You Should Know About Pubg Warrior Pack