Support my work on Patreon: http://ow.ly/3ymWFu
PayPal Donations Welcome. Click here: http://goo.gl/NSdOvK
5G Technology: Potential Risks To Human Health: Excerpts From Scientific Conference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvPg1AyQ43I
IARC article: http://ow.ly/x3aL1017tA9
World's Largest Animal Study on Cell Tower Radiation Confirms Cancer Link: http://ow.ly/ive31017tAa
cancer.gov article: http://ow.ly/ETQx1017tAc
Creative commons, royalty free images & Videos used in this video presentation are sourced from https://pixabay.com/ and Wiki Media Commons. These are public commons images.
Help Support My Channel. Buy Computing Forever Merchandise, Mugs, Hats, T-Shirts: http://ow.ly/3v3TWq
Subscribe to my Second Channel: http://ow.ly/XgZm100E1L6
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/user/LACK78
KEEP UP ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/ComputingForever
Google+ : LACK78: http://goo.gl/k4gWsg
Google+: Computing Forever: http://goo.gl/Q8gZpY
I think the greatest radiation i am getting right now and a stomach cancer is from the stupidity by these unintelligent fucks that have no idea what they are talking about, but are born to spread fear, because they have zero ability to understand how something works.
We don't need 5G, all that we need is to go back to the stone age.
I don't know much about the health impacts or even just the mechanics of radiation, but I'm aware of its omnipresence. I suppose, as with many things, there is a safe threshold of exposure, so the real question should perhaps be where that threshold is and when do we go past it?
What I find funny is that I copy and pasted this from an article on 5G. “Never put mobile devices directly against your body. For instance, don’t put a cell phone against your head, in your bra, or even in your pocket with out an EMF shield.” So how will we use our phones if you can’t put it against your head?
Wikipedia gives 5G frequencies as:-
"5G will use spectrum in the existing LTE frequency range (600 MHz to 6 GHz) and also in millimeter wave bands (24–86 GHz)."
About 8 to 10 years ago, I attended a seminar for the media on the supposedly carcinogenic potential of cellular radiation organised by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission, Malaysia's communications and multimedia content regulator and just as you pointed out, the studies by the World Health Organisation argue that the microwave frequencies employed - i.e. 900MHz, 1,800 MHz, 2.1GHz, 2.3GHz and the 4G LTE frequency 2.6GHz are non-ionising and at most cause heating in body tissue exposed to them.
X-Ray frequencies on the other hand range from 30 petahertz to 30 exahertz and much care and shielding of X-Ray equipment operators are employed here to minimise or eliminate their long-term exposure to such radiation.
According to Wikipedia, ionising radiation begins from the high end of the ultraviolet spectrum, all the way up through X-Rays and Gamma rays, whilst lower ultra violet frequencies, visible light, infra-red and radio waves are non-ionising.
Electromagnetic radiation at Ionising frequencies would split electrons from atoms and molecules, leaving positively charged ions, which are chemically reactive (i.e. oxidants) and thus potentially carcinogenic but apart from the risk of someone who stands right up against a cellphone base station antenna being burned by the strength of radiation emitted. however the strength of the radiation at ground level, would be safe, given that its intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance (the radius) from the antenna. Something often ignored in arguments against cell tower radiation is that cellular communications is by necessity bidirectional and the phone must also transmits back to the base station to enable two-way voice or data communications.
Likewise with WiFi signals, where the PC or smartphone user is much closer to their PC's or smartphone's WiFi transmitter than the WiFi router and notebook users are sitting less than a metre away from their notebook's WiFi transmissions from the antenna housed in their notebook's cover beside the edges of their LCD or LED display. So anyone who is all that concerned over exposure to WiFi signals may want to turn off their notebook's WiFi adaptor and plug in a LAN cable instead, where available, such as in an office.
The speakers pointed out that any risk, if any, would potentially come from the cellphone itself when used at the edge of a base station's coverage, since the cellphone would have to boost its transmission power so that the signal can be adequately received by the receiving antenna at the base station and the cellphone is held right up to our ear.
The speakers acknowledged the results of various studies which suggest that even the non-ionising radiation from cell towers and cellphones could be carcinogenic but argue that unless the findings of such studies can be repeated by independent studies conducted by peers, such findings cannot be taken as conclusive and that those reported findings which suggest that cellphone radiation is carcinogenic, have not been found to have yielded the same result when conducted by peers, so are regarded as inconclusive.
This of course is the "establishment" opinion, so whilst I accept it as the most authoritative so far, however I maintain a certain scepticism and an open mind to new findings, whether regarded as conclusive or inconclusive by the "establishment" scientific community.
I have been using a cellphone since 1996 and I used to find my right ear having got rather warm after a long cellphone conversation and I later found that a cataract had developed in my right eye to the point that it got so bad that I had to have an implant. However my left eye is still OK and I often wonder whether the cataract in my right eye was due to my eye's lens being slowly cooked by radiation from my cellphone, which I hold up to my right ear. I asked my eye surgeon about this but he did not think that the cataract was due to exposure to the heating affects of radiation from my cellphone.
A even more concerning thing is if there are studies that suggest 5g is okay.
Who did/paid for that study?
Not everything is done in our best interests.
Actually most things are done apposed to the average persons interest.
All in the name of money.
This tech is going to be seen as a way to generate allot of money.
The companies who aim to profit and already invested there money into this tech will spend more money to guarantee return on investment.
So that really clouds any research going forward.
So not all research can be counted as equal.
Personally many things that exist now when I think about the possible repercussions I'm faced with, is very un comforting.
Allot of the times I choose to just not think about it.
Because life is difficult enough without extending my worries.
If this happens.... When this happens it's going to be the same story.
Regardless I can't avoid it even if I come to the conclusion on my own that I do feel there are health risks.
So I'll just have to cross my fingers and hope that everything will be okay......
We're just along for the ride.
There is no reason to worry about cancer because that would be the last thing to kill us since it is slower developing. What will kill everyone are the flu and pneumonia.
It's the ions that will kill off entire populations. Harmful ions slow down or stop cilial movement, and they will lower biological cell voltage exposing everyone to the 28,000 viruses we breathe in each day. Cellular voltage is our primary immune protector. Viruses love low and no voltage cells.
IOW, when 5G is turned on full blast, you and everyone around you will be getting sick quickly. and permanently.
What bothers me is that 95% of us don’t need more than 4g... 5g will be meaninglessly fast who needs those kinds of speeds on cellphones?! To remotely play vr games through your phone by streaming your pc or something, there has to be a limit ...
They do not need more linear Speed. No. All they need is Parallel signals running at slightly different frequencies. The claim that Higher 5G and even that 4G was or ever will be needed is a Lie, and Thus is Proof of Intent to Cause Harm. 32bit is 2^32=4.3 Billion bits of info, and then 2^64=18 Pentillion bits of info. They are duping you so badly it actually goes over your head, because lets face it, who wants to admit they could not figure out that two brains were faster than one You were duped into thinking your brain had to run faster, when you could instead just use two brains. So.... Are you still going to give them permission to kill you, because you can not count to (2) ??? Your Choice... But if you do not cut down those poles in the U.K. you will all be dead withing 5 years... Ever damn one of you. Your choice.... You would really be better off wading out to sea with the Lemming Chap... because I was a Microwave Engineer back in the 90's in the Military.... USAF Microwave Combat Communications... Worked in the Civilian field two... https://www.emfresearch.com/us-nmri-studies/
It is a threat once they cover the whole globe with their towers they will turn on the dam in amplifiers to maximum capacity all at once to deal one shot drive by to kill us all you don't have to overthink it it's just common sense nuclear radio frequencies are bad for people's health period
The obvious first is the inverse square law
Have a phone directly against your head verses a foot away is a massive difference in body loading of RF. This applies to cell towers obviously too.
5G license are in the millimeter bands, Verizon is testing in the 28GHz area. Could it be possible that beam forming could limit exposure, it could also do the opposite too.
I think the radiation fear model is very misleading. That is ionizing like UV light we are exposed to every day. There might be some not understood metabolic changes that could be possible, not (fear) cancer.
I use acousticom 2 RF meter to protect myself from radiation. The cities are too polluted. EHS (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity) people can feel the radiation and the first side effects from it are headaches, tiredness and irritability. Look it up and stop using Wifi. Good luck.
In Australia, 3G was shit but covered a lot of area.
4G is good, but is pretty much limited to population centres. Way way less coverage than 3G.
I just don’t believe 5G will the big deal everyone is making it out to be. I’d imagine it would be offered in the highest density areas anyway. The cost of installation would far out way the systems ability to generate income.
So my personal thoughts are it may be more dangerous, but it won’t encompass the vast majority of anywhere really. It’ll only be for super dense city areas and even on the outskirts of city centres it’ll be crap.
Anywhere they place cellphone towers, you will find CANCER CLUSTERS!
Plenty of health studies on this already (decades old information) .... THE COMMUNICATION COMPANIES ARE LYING AND THE OWN THE GOVERNMENT POLITICIANS/AGENCIES WHO ARE RUBBER STAMPING IT!
If you live near a cell tower your chances of getting cancer increase by 2500x!
Enjoy your cancer!
Remember, these are the same doubebags that told the people of Flint, Michigan that the lead in their water was at safe and reasonable levels 🤣
... or that smoking was perfectly safe and the study was conducted by the Tobacco Industry and you should trust them because if you're dead you can't smoke right?
cancer is interesting too, but impossible to explain where it's coming from and why it's picking up momentum (in western countries). believe it or not but we are upsetting the natural laws of our existens, and i'm not saying we should go back living I caves. But we should be more careful what we let loose in the public before knowing how it effects us. I'd rather be without a phone and cancer then the other way around.
There is a probability that they are doing this on purpose, many people with power even the English royals have talked for many years about lowering the world's population... by any means... this could be just one of the many ways that helps their dream become a reality.
This question is relevant to me, as this week I've been configuring and testing a pair of 5G antennas to wirelessly connect two buildings where I work. Their potential range is over 5 miles, yet they're on a table behind me just a few feet away.
this is usual scaremongering claptrap - stoking a bit of fear of the unknown - the reason there are no LONG TERM studies or findings is because 5G is a technology that is only in its development phase - the testing phase - to see the levels of speeds and latency possible - so all this 'oh it might give you cancer and they wont tell us what the long term effects are are pretty illogical - its like saying they haven't said what the long term effects of driverless cars are - look the big shift for 5G is really just about changing mobile networks to become cloud based - yes it will need more small cells to improve the speed , reduce latency and the technical features of it are of course being tested for safety - china have committed to spending 400bn dollars + to roll out the 5G newtwork and this will give them the lead in connected cities , connected cars , connected factories etc - it is probably not a stretch to say they will become global leader in what may be a shift as big as an industrial revolution - bloviating and scrare mongering along the lines of water turning the the fircken frogs gay should be below this channel output.
The speed gains when going from 4G to 5G is totally superflous. Noone will notice any meaningful difference. It will merely move download times closer to the times you get on a landline, but a landline is still superior. For the vast majority, even the step from 3G to 4G was unneccessary.
Current mobile phones already have inflated native resolutions. You wouldn't notice any difference from cranking them up more. All of that data is wasted.
Ask yourself: Do you need more download speed on your cellphone while you're on the go? At the current speeds you can watch youtube and HD streams just fine. The only difference you might notice is if you download huge chunks of data like a game. But why would you? Most cellphones doesn't even have room for beyond 10 gigs of extra space.
There is really no meaningful demand for 5G. The telecom companies aren't the ones who are going to build the towers. The state will. This is a very good example of the failure of the state and how they build infrastructure that we don't need or want. It's crony capitalism at its finest.
And with the extremely poor range of 5G, frankly we would be better off by simply expanding the landline connected wifi networks. Wifi is the least intensive out of all the wireless technologies, and it's also very fast.
But you all should avoid wifi whenever you can too. Cable is completely safe and also faster and more stable.
It is going to be used for depopulation. 5g was created and is being developed by Israel. The technology has probably been around long before it’s being released as with all other technology, and I’m sure they know how deadly it is going to be. Cancer and infertility rates are going to increase tenfold.
I remember the days before cellphone towers existed around my neighborhood. Times were much more free-feeling. I was able to go around my neighborhood without having to see a metal pole with cellphone receivers at the top of it... Now, there's one at the local park where I live, and it's a big one...
I guess cellphone towers are the new "tree", and should be looked at as such...?
A lightbulb has fare more energetic radiation than the maximum 100 GHz used in 5G. To put in perspective, 300 THz is the minimum frequency needed for a silicon solar cell to work and this is still in the infrared range. Only at 1000 THz do we reach near UV.
I'm all for progress but the speed and recklessness with which technology is being pushed out these days is getting too much in my opinion. I think we need to take a step back, before we risk waking up one day and finding out that we've long passed the turning point e.g. all of the developed world is infertile due to radiation damaging the egg cells that all women are born with and must be protected with great care (this would be a pretty dire event... I'm thinking worst case)
I'm from the future. As soon as the 5G towers were turned on, we all became mutants with super powers. The outcome was horrific. Liberals, SJW, and many millennials just became super lazy, got incredibly fat, and bursted to oblivion. Why I'm I here? To build the towers ever sooner. Thank you.
If they don’t know how the skin will react why don’t they send in a volunteering human/animal to find out.
Instead of just activating it and going foreword with something we don’t know anything about.
These people are smart but they are really fucking unwise.
It’s better to be wise than smart.
the same BS was said when microwaves were a new technology, the same thing was said when cellphones emit radiowaves that could cause brain cancer by entering the ears of people. The same thing was said about the airport scanners emitting high dosages of Xrays that could kill a person. The same thing was said about hospital scanners when they were first used.
Here's a pretty thorough list of known, dangerous effects of 5G:
This is just a taste. There's far more information out there. These people pushing 5G are lying to us. They know EXACTLY how much of a threat it is to human life.
I have made an app which contains a tool to measure electromagnetic fields. Nobody ever was interested, thus I believe nobody cares. The app is called Over Fifty and can be downloaded from Google Play App Store.
"This study confirms ... bla bla"
Cool story, they P-hacked to get those results without realising it.
Measuring one casuative factor with many different results allows you to ignore the misses and circle the hits.
For example, there was a study that "confirmed" that chocolate helps you lose weight, they achieved this the same way this study achieved its goals.
The fact is there is no way for non-ionising radiation to do any damage to your body.
"The researchers don't fully know for sure"
Nothing is ever certain in science, they can only say that wifi radiation is dangerous by ignoring the little known field of science called particle physics and QED the fields that operate using the most accurate scientific theory ever devised, so accurate that calculations are likely more accurate than experimental results.
So sure if we ignore all scientific advances for the last 100 years its unknown whether wifi is safe, but I put it to you that this is an asinine stance to take.
Who do you think pays for the studies that say it's safe? "Science" isn't free. Of course the "data" is conflicting, when there is so much money at stake. The companies pushing for it have more money, so we should eventually expect there to be more studies claiming the safety, if it is enough of a barrier to adoption.
So, how many times will we listen to these fear mongers. Video games cause violence, cell phones cause cancer. We should wake up to the fact that all these fear mongers are trying to keep their jobs. Don't these guys get tired of being wrong?
Dumb worries. The sweat glands, if they absorb it, will absorb it as HEAT, which is exactly what they are best equipped to deal with. And the levels we're talking about are trivial compared with something like being outside in the sun.
Got a message from our lord and saviour super science god that 5g is the coming and it is good, praise darwin in his infinite wisdom and our lord on earth richard dawkins nema or amen, we do things backwards for our saint aleister crowley.
5G WiFi only travels a short distance so they would need a signal box outside every house on the street to actually connect these, and with the jump from possibly having a 5G Router in your home(not all WiFi routers are 5G) which they tell you is safe because it’s affects are so minuscule to having dozens of them all over completely enveloping the area with large amounts of these radio waves concentrated it could start to cause Very Serious Health issues almost immediately
“Is 5G dangerous?”
YES! In many, many ways!
It’s so obviously a bad thing to people who understand and so precariously an “unsure” topic to people WHO DONT UNDERSTAND. And that’s tragically MOST people! Fml
5G is again, a generation, and not a frequency, we will still use many of the same bands that we use with 4g, just with a more efficient protocol. Yes, I do acknowledge the fact that they are introducing shorter frequency bands, but these will only be used in dense areas, they have worse range, but much higher bandwidth capacities. Also, take into consideration that since 5g is suppose to be more efficient, it may actually be safer! Even thought it's pretty fucking safe already!
The PC community has grown a good deal in a really limited time frame and there isnt any reason to believe the game wont be equally as addicting for Xbox players. The site states its something PUBG Corp wants to add down the road, perhaps as soon as the game is finished, as shown by a Microsoft representative. More info about the 3 PUBG cosmetic packs are found over on Xbox Wire. The lot of different cheats weve encountered has far surpassed our expectations. Start out with our substantial range of PUBG ideas, which provides you with a whopping number of approaches to assist in improving your game. Just ensure you choose only the appropriate account for you! At times you will discover that you require a different video card to totally experience what the game offers.
The Honest to Goodness Truth on Pubg Warrior Pack
Nevertheless, its always tough to locate a trustworthy seller of a Black Desert account on account of the risk involved in these sorts of transactions. Bring on such a desert map! We guess because its about becoming the lone survivor, even if theres a lot of teamwork on the way.
The game will probably remain in early access for some moment. It continues to attract new players that are hoping to get that sweet, sweet chicken dinner. This usually means youre have to begin downloading the game at midnight, and after that begin playing once PUBG is installed. There isnt just one play through of Black Desert that ends up the same because its up to the player to determine the method by which they level. Because of this, players will need to use the Xbox Game Preview program to be able to play the game. Xbox One players might have to wait somewhat longer for the full-release edition. They will also be able to purchase some exclusive content in the form of special cosmetic packs.
Things You Should Know About Pubg Warrior Pack